Rivero Mestre’s lawyers are known as game changers. While appellate law traditionally focuses on what happened in the lower court, we believe that a holistic strategy is critical in our appellate litigation practice, especially when challenging or defending a decision. Our creativity in looking over the horizon gives us an advantage over opponents. But we know that coming up with an innovative approach is only part of the recipe for success—relentlessly executing our ideas through excellent briefs and exceptional oral arguments is what makes us successful.
In addition to arguing appeals, our team provides trial support for other lawyers. Working quickly, we provide high-quality pleadings, pre-trial motions, favorable jury instructions, preparation of witnesses, and assistance with any other pre-trial matters that may arise. Further, we can be there through trial, either at the table or back at the office, on call. It’s up to you.
Our appellate practice lawyers and trial support group have experience in appeals in federal and state court. Below are a few recent examples.
W Holding Co., Inc. v. AIG Ins. Co., 748 F.3d 377 (1st Cir. 2014)
We obtained the first favorable “Insured v. Insured” coverage ruling in relation to the FDIC’s claims in the latest banking crisis. The First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court of Puerto Rico’s order that required Chartis to advance defense costs to defendant directors and officers. The First Circuit Court agreed that our clients, the former directors and officers of Westernbank, were covered under the policy because Puerto Rico law requires an insurance company to advance defense costs if the claims against the insured create a “remote possibility” of coverage.
Cedeno v. Castillo, 457 Fed. App’x 35 (2d Cir. 2012)
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed an order from the Southern District of New York dismissing RICO allegations against our clients for failure to state a claim. The District Court held that the complaint alleged only an extraterritorial application of RICO beyond the reach of the statute. Because this ruling potentially limited the extraterritorial reach of criminal and civil RICO claims brought by the government, the U.S. Department of Justice intervened against our position on appeal. Nonetheless, the Second Circuit agreed with us and affirmed the District Court’s dismissal with prejudice.
Chevron Corp. v. Berlinger, 629 F.3d 297 (2d Cir. 2011)
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed an order from the Southern District of New York compelling the production of 600 hours of outtakes from a film entitled Crude, about a massive environmental litigation in Ecuador.This was, by far, the largest volume of video outtakes ever ordered produced in the history of the United States. These outtakes were used by the joint-defense team representing attorneys for a subsidiary of Chevron Corporation, in one of the world’s largest and most complex litigations.
Armas v. Banco Nacional De Crédito, C.A., 129 So. 3d 404 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)
In a business dispute originating in Venezuela, between a Venezuelan bank and a Venezuelan citizen concerning issues of Venezuelan law, Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal reversed and remanded for the trial court to conduct a forum non conveniens analysis. During the pendency of the appeal, the trial court had entered summary judgment against our client, and the Third District Court also reversed that final judgment because it interfered with the power of the appellate court.
River Bridge Corp. v. American Somax Ventures, 76 So. 3d 986 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
When we began our representation of ExxonMobil affiliates River Bridge Corporation and River Bridge Realty Corporation, the plaintiff had already obtained a final judgment for more than $1.2 million and a judgment for more than $3.5 million in prevailing-party attorneys’ fees. Although the appellate court reversed one count of the final judgment, the trial court declined to reconsider the fee award. We appealed the fee award and Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed and remanded for a new evidentiary hearing to determine whether the reversed count was a distinct claim for purposes of the fees sought, and to reconsider the amount of the fee award in light of the lodestar factors for fee calculation.
Henriques v. Crespo, 63 So. 3d 31 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)
The absolute litigation privilege protects attorneys from defamation and slander claims that arise during the course of a judicial proceeding, so long as the challenged statements or conduct are related to the proceeding. Here, we defended the trial court’s entry of judgment on the pleadings finding that an absolute litigation privilege defense existed. Our client, an attorney, discovered that his pro bono clients, an elderly couple, may have been defrauded. He brought third-party claims in a foreclosure action against a title company on behalf of the elderly couple. The title company sued the attorney for libel. Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s order applying the litigation privilege defense.
Temple v. Neff Rental, LLC, 3D14-2456 (Fla. 3d DCA Feb. 11, 2015)
In a per curiam affirmance, Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal upheld the trial court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction over a nonresident former employee who misappropriated his former Florida employer’s confidential information. During his employment, he signed employment contracts containing a Florida forum-selection clause. That fact, in conjunction with his extensive employment-related contacts with Florida, gave the trial and appellate courts sufficient basis to assert general long‒arm jurisdiction over the nonresident former employee, and to conclude that due process was satisfied.
Goodson v. HSBC Bank USA, NA, 2D13-3060 (Fla. 2d DCA Sept. 19, 2014)
Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal affirmed a final summary judgment in favor of the lending bank. The borrowers raised 85 affirmative defenses, moved at the last minute to continue the summary judgment hearing, and claimed that the trial court had denied them due process. We were not trial counsel, but were brought in to defend the final judgment. We demonstrated that there were no facts in dispute and that the Bank either had effectively refuted the affirmative defenses or established that the defenses were legally insufficient.
May 18, 2020
MIAMI—Rivero Mestre LLP is pleased to announce that Andrés Rivero and Jorge A. Mestre have been recognized in the 2020 edition of the South Florida Legal Guide (SFLG) as “Top Lawyers.” SFLG is published annually, and is a widely respected source of top legal firms and lawyers, by practice group, in the South Florida region. […]
May 15, 2020
MIAMI—Neha Dagley spoke on the Miami Chapter of TiE webinar titled “Effective Legal Contracts & Force Majeure Implications in COVID-19 crisis,” on May 14, 2020. TiE Global is a nonprofit venture devoted to entrepreneurs in all industries, at all stages, from incubation, throughout the entrepreneurial lifecycle. With a global reach and a local focus, the […]
May 14, 2020
MIAMI—M. Paula Aguila moderated a panel on the American Bar Association webinar titled “LATAM Vs. COVID-19: Responses and Strategies to Face the Impact of an Unparalleled Enemy,” on May 7, 2020. The webinar featured a panel that discussed the impact in Latin America, including employment law issues like furloughs and terminations, contractual issues such as […]
May 13, 2020
MIAMI—Rivero Mestre is proud to announce Bryan L. Paschal has been recognized as a 2020 On the Rise honoree by the Daily Business Review (DBR). Paschal will be honored at the DBR’s Professional Excellence Awards event this Fall. “I am honored to be included on this list that has so many amazing and talented lawyers,” […]
Apr 29, 2020
MIAMI—Rivero Mestre announces that the firm has been recognized by Chambers & Partners (Chambers) in the 2020 edition of Chambers USA as a top-ranked Florida firm for General Commercial Litigation. Chambers also recognized partners Andrés Rivero, Jorge A. Mestre, and Amanda McGovern for General Commercial Litigation. Amanda McGovern is recognized as a top tier “Band […]
Apr 27, 2020
MIAMI—Despite the coronavirus crisis, Rivero Mestre LLP continues to grow as we proudly announce that we have added two new attorneys, Neha Dagley and Sylmarie Trujillo. In addition to the new hires, our attorneys and staff have been working remotely while remaining accessible to the needs of our clients. Our team is known for its […]
Apr 21, 2020
MIAMI—As the world reacts to the ever-evolving health crisis, Andrés Rivero and Jorge Mestre have joined together with other leading professionals in The Florida Business Continuity Task Force. It is the aim of the task force to provide the Florida business community with timely information and resources. “Although we must keep our social distance this […]
Mar 10, 2020
MIAMI—Radio Televisión Martí reported on Rivero Mestre’s representation of José Ramon López Regueiro, the rightful owner of Cuba’s main airport—José Martí International Airport—against American Airlines and LATAM Airlines Group in a lawsuit filed under the Helms-Burton Act. “The trial of the case is scheduled for later this year. The processes are progressing quite fast and […]
Mar 6, 2020
MIAMI—Radio Televisión Martí featured Rivero Mestre’s representation of the Mata family, the rightful owners of the Hotel San Carlos in Cienfuegos, Cuba, in a documentary discussing the Helms-Burton Act. The documentary aired on Mega TV, was broadcast by Radio Televisión Martí, and will be aired on PBS in April. The segment featuring Rivero Mestre begins […]
Mar 2, 2020
MIAMI—Jorge A. Mestre co-edited the recently published book, Discovery Across the Globe: Obtaining Evidence Abroad to Support U.S. Proceedings. The book discusses the procedures for obtaining evidence in the United States through the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil and Commercial Matters of 1970. […]
Feb 11, 2020
MIAMI—Jorge A. Mestre will speak at the Mass Torts Made Perfect Seminar in Las Vegas on Thursday, April 23. Mestre will be speaking about third-party payer class actions on a panel entitled “The Latest on Zantac.” Mass Torts Made Perfect is a bi-annual conference held in the spring and fall of each year in Las […]
Feb 1, 2020
MIAMI—Jorge A. Mestre spoke on the American Association for Justice webinar titled, “Status of Zantac Litigation,” on January 31, 2020. The webinar featured a panel that discussed product background information and the liability story. Mestre spoke specifically about the role of third-party payer claims in the Zantac litigation. Mestre’s practice focuses exclusively on commercial litigation and […]