Various businesses and individuals, including Mr. Antoniazzi and Green Pampas, were alleged to have violated both the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962 and New York law in connection with the sale of urea to Paraguayan and Peruvian corporations and related letters of credit.

U.S. District Court Judge Paul A. Engelmayer dismissed all claims against Mr. Antoniazzi and Green Pampas, finding that the plaintiffs’ RICO claim failed as a matter of law and that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over Mr. Antoniazzi and Green Pampas. Further, the court noted that even if jurisdiction were proper as to Green Pampas, dismissal would be independently merited based on a binding arbitration provision in the parties’ purchase agreement.

Andrés Rivero, Jorge A. Mestre, and William Silcott of Rivero Mestre represented Green Pampas and Mr. Antoniazzi.

Click here to see the Opinion and Order.

The post Rivero Mestre wins dismissal in RICO action appeared first on RIVERO MESTRE LLP | Miami + New York Attorneys | International Law | Commercial Litigation.

The action alleged that Venezuelan government officials and business figures, including Mr. Lara and AIL, violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962, in connection with the Venezuelan government’s approval of a currency exchange application and the sale of two Venezuelan banks for $150 million.

The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed the case, finding that RICO does not apply where the alleged enterprise and the impact of the alleged predicate activity are entirely foreign. U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff relied on Morrison v. Nat’l Australia Bank Ltd., a June 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that held when a statute gives no clear indication of an extraterritorial application—in this case, RICO—it presumably has none. The district court further rejected the argument that RICO would apply simply because of allegations of a few isolated financial transactions in the U.S. “[T]he presumption against extraterritoriality,” noted the court, “would be a craven watchdog indeed if it retreated to its kennel whenever some domestic activity is involved in the case.”

The Second Circuit, ruling in favor of Mr. Lara, AIL, and other defendants, affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the case with prejudice. The Second Circuit noted that the complaint alleged inadequate conduct in the U.S. to state a domestic RICO claim and that the alleged enterprise was “patently foreign.”

Andrés Rivero, Catherine Grieve, and Erimar von der Osten of Rivero Mestre represented Mr. Lara and AIL.

Click here to see the Second Circuit Summary Order.

The post Rivero Mestre wins Second Circuit appeal in extraterritorial RICO case appeared first on RIVERO MESTRE LLP | Miami + New York Attorneys | International Law | Commercial Litigation.